In his book, Resurgent in the Midst of Crisis: Sacred
Liturgy, the Traditional Latin Mass, and Renewal in the Church, author Peter
Kwasniewski discusses the priesthood in a number of different contexts. Consider
this paragraph (with my emphases):
Preparing for Mass |
…The
priest’s hands are specially
consecrated with holy oil – why? So that he may rightly and fittingly handle
the Blessed Sacrament; that he may handle God
Incarnate. His hands are sanctified
in view of touching and administering the holy gifts. A layman’s hands are
not consecrated in this way. We receive the
Blessed Sacrament from the hands of the priest, like a baby bird being fed in
the nest by its parent. From this symbolic vantage, it is utterly inappropriate that the priest put the host
into our hands, so that we may
then administer communion to ourselves,
symbolizing that we owe our nourishment to our own action, as dutiful
democratic Pelagians would have it… [T]he priest is a man set apart by Holy
Orders, and his hands, too, like the rest of his powers of body and soul, are dedicated to sacred service. Communion
in the hand, therefore, helps create and support that noxious atmosphere of
egalitarianism, horizontalism, and activism that has stifled the Church’s
spiritual life in the past half-century. (p. 101-2)
I don’t remember exactly when I
switched from receiving Holy Communion in the hand to receiving on the tongue,
but I think I made that switch before I had actually experience the EF Mass. It
was a result of what I experienced in the way a very reverent priest celebrated
novus ordo Mass (ad orientem and in
Latin) before Summorum Pontificum
took effect. I had become aware of the basic concept of the priest’s
consecrated hands. Before that, I had been a “Eucharistic minister”, but I abandoned
that “ministry”. And long before that, I had ceased taking Holy Communion to
the homebound, because it just didn’t seem right for me, a layperson, to be
handing the Blessed Sacrament that way.
In The Life and Revelations of Anne Catherine Emmerich, Sister
Emmerich’s veneration of a priest’s hands is mentioned in a number of places.
Sometimes she sought just to touch her confessor’s hand, knowing the power of
its consecration. She knew how special that consecration is. Here’s an excerpt
I read the other day:
…And
of the priest’s consecrated fingers [Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich] says that
were his body fallen to dust and his soul in Hell, yet will the consecration
still be recognized in the bones of the fingers; they will burn with an
altogether peculiar fire, so ineffaceable is the mark.
While Blessed Anne Catherine
Emmerich’s pronouncements are not dogma, this certainly gives one pause, does
it not? The priest’s hands are specially consecrated; that is something we
forget with the endless processions of “extraordinary ministers of the
Eucharist” from amongst the laity. Ponder that next time you are at Mass and see
lay people administering the Host at Holy Communion! Think of that when you see
people receiving Holy Communion in their unconsecrated hands – the very Body of
Christ, casually given and received by the hands of the laity!!
Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me.
No comments:
Post a Comment