I went to my favorite place for
the Feast of the Assumption of Our Lady, and though I was only there for 24
hours, I assisted at 3 Masses in the extraordinary form. I returned home Friday
evening, and went to Mass (Novus Ordo)
on Saturday evening to fulfill my Sunday obligation. It felt like there was not
enough time to make the attitude adjustment back to the “new” Mass mindset, but
that’s the way the cookie crumbles (as my mother used to say).
The pastor at our parish is a
devout priest who feels helpless to effect much of a shift toward tradition
amongst the parishioners. He almost always starts off his homily by reminding
us of what a great gift God has given us in the Eucharist, and that he never
fails to mention that we are about to receive the Body and Blood, Soul and
Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.
On Saturday night, as I
listened to him, I thought about how he always says that same thing, and that
it's a good thing to be reminded of...and then it hit me: in more traditional parishes
– especially where the extraordinary form of the Mass is celebrated – that
reminder doesn't have to be made by the priest in his homily at every Mass,
because the reality of it is present
in the very architecture of the church, the structure of the Mass, the posture
of the priest, the words of the prayers, and even in the way the chant lifts
one's mind to God. Our parish priest has to remind his flock about the Real
Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist because there are so few other reminders
there to foster that knowledge.
The whole thrust of the typical
Novus Ordo parish, in my limited experience, is earthbound. Fr. J generally
seeks to bring the Divine down to the level of human existence on earth. There
is something to be said for that; it's good to apply the Scriptures to our
daily lives in some way, to live out the Gospel, etc. But there is so little
emphasis on getting to Heaven. It's more about doing good here on earth,
because Jesus did good here on earth, and he told us to feed the hungry and
take care of the sick. But why do we do those things? And there is
seldom any emphasis or even mention of the spiritual works of mercy.
I was struck by similar
thoughts while singing the Office of Vigils of the Assumption and listening to
the readings. For instance, in the 7th reading there was the statement that:
"Indeed
there was no happier or more joyful day for Mary, if we duly consider the
happiness of both body and soul granted to her on that day. Then especially, as
never before, her spirit, soul and body rejoiced wondrously in the living
God..."
And there were of course other
gems in those readings. Then, in the sermon I heard at the Mass of the
Assumption, the priest talked about why the
Assumption is important for us. I never hear that kind of talk in the homilies
I listen to at the NO parishes near
me. I thought of that during vigils. I
thought, "How sad that so few people will read these readings or hear
these thoughts expressed", and it occurred to me that that's what's
gone so wrong with so many parishes. It’s been said in lots of other ways – catechesis
is so bad, so watered-down, so…non-existent,
it seems! But how many priests or bishops really encourage their people to
think below the surface of these great feast days? Not too many, as far as I
can tell.
I sat there listening to the
homily on Saturday night, and I thought about the whole Mass and the prayers of
the faithful and all the usual “stuff” one experiences at the NO Mass (female altar servers, a
contingent of lay women administered Holy Communion, guitar music, etc.), I
thought, "This is Kindergarten."
A friend with whom I shared
these observations suggested that what I have described here is the result of
the modernistic philosophy of “immanentism”
(go to that link for a very good, short description of immanentism vs.
immanence). Fr. John Hardon is said to
have referred to immanentist apologetics as a “method of establishing the
credibility of the Christian faith by appealing to the subjective satisfaction
that the faith gives to the believer.” I think it is immanentism that lurks behind
the dangerous notion of “a personal relationship with Jesus” as expressed by
most Protestants who use that phrase.
Immanentism makes religion into
a subjective mish-mash of feelings: Mass must make you “feel good”. I sat at
Mass Saturday night, thinking about the fact that the powers-that-be seem to believe
that Mass has to be entertaining and “easy”; it can’t require any hard thinking
or any difficult examination of conscience. We have to be “inviting” and “welcoming”,
and the way that is done is by emphasizing a “feel good” Jesus who loves us
unconditionally (which, of course, He does) and who would never want us to feel
bad about anything (which is far from the truth).
And that’s why I thought, “This
is Kindergarten.” In Kindergarten, we invite little children to feel good about
themselves, and to enjoy all the activities that are offered, and to become a
part of a little “community”. We don’t expect much of them that would be
considered difficult.
It’s the same at the
Kindergarten Mass. Jesus loves me, this I know. Ah yes. But there is so much more to Him than that! Even the
Protestant pastor whom I knew long ago had a more Catholic idea than that! He always
said, “Jesus loves you just the way you are…and He loves you too much to leave
you there.”
Sadly, our priests and bishops
seem to be quite willing for us to remain just as we are. And sadder still, they
seem to want to turn a blind eye to our sins, and allow us to do the same!
Where is the charity in that? Where is the pastoral prudence in that?
Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me.
No comments:
Post a Comment